Global Seafood Safety Testing Market Size is expected to reach USD 23.94 Billion by 2035 from USD 4.73 Billion in 2024, with a CAGR of around 15.86% between 2024 and 2035. The global seafood safety testing market has been driven by rising concerns over foodborne illnesses and stricter international trade regulations. Increasing cases of contamination due to heavy metals, pathogens, and toxins have led to higher testing demand. In countries like Japan and Norway, rigorous testing has been adopted after contamination incidents affected exports. Another key driver has been the global rise in seafood consumption, especially in urban areas, where quality assurance is demanded by health-conscious consumers. However, high testing costs and limited access to advanced facilities in developing countries have restrained the market. Many small-scale fisheries have struggled to afford regular testing, affecting their global competitiveness. Still, growing investment in rapid testing technologies has opened new opportunities. Portable kits and AI-based analysis tools have been introduced in regions like Southeast Asia, allowing quicker results at lower costs. Another opportunity lies in expanding testing labs across coastal economies. Nations like Vietnam and Chile have started building infrastructure to ensure compliance with export standards. With seafood being a major source of protein for millions, safety testing has become essential. The market is expected to grow as countries tighten import rules and consumers demand greater transparency in the sourcing and handling of seafood products.

Driver: Rising Demand Fuels Safer Seafood
The surge in global seafood consumption has played a major role in driving the seafood safety testing market. As more people shift toward seafood for its health benefits, demand has soared across both developed and emerging economies. This rise has placed pressure on suppliers to meet safety expectations, especially in premium markets like the United States and parts of Europe. In large cities such as Dubai and Singapore, restaurants and retailers have been enforcing strict quality standards, requiring regular testing before products reach consumers. In India, seafood hubs like Kochi have ramped up lab facilities to ensure exported shrimp meet international safety standards. Similarly, in Ghana, fish processing plants have begun implementing testing protocols to maintain access to European markets. The demand for sashimi-grade products in upscale restaurants has also led to increased pathogen testing. Consumers now look beyond taste and freshness—they want reassurance that what they eat is free from harmful bacteria, toxins, or chemical residues. As seafood finds its way into meal kits, frozen packs, and gourmet dining, the pressure to ensure safety has become constant. This shift in consumer behavior is not only reshaping food supply chains but also making seafood safety testing a non-negotiable part of the industry.
Key Insights:
- Approximately 50% of seafood processing facilities globally have adopted safety testing protocols to comply with stringent regulatory requirements.
- Governments and companies have collectively invested over USD 500 million in seafood safety testing technologies to enhance food safety measures.
- Over 100,000 tons of seafood are tested annually for contaminants such as pathogens, heavy metals, and chemical residues.
- The penetration rate of seafood safety testing in export-oriented seafood industries is around 70%, driven by international trade regulations.
- Advanced methods like PCR and ELISA have improved testing accuracy by 25%, ensuring better detection of contaminants.
- Seafood safety testing is mandated in over 80 countries worldwide, with significant adoption in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific regions.
- Regulatory bodies such as the FDA and EFSA require mandatory testing for pathogens like Salmonella and Vibrio, impacting over 60% of seafood producers globally.
- Seafood safety testing is critical in high-risk segments like ready-to-eat meals, accounting for about 40% of all tests conducted.
Segment Analysis:
The seafood safety testing market is segmented by detection type and application, each playing a vital role in ensuring food quality. Microbiological detection has been widely used to identify harmful bacteria like Salmonella and Vibrio, especially in raw and ready-to-eat seafood. In coastal regions of Thailand, street food vendors have adopted on-site microbiological testing to avoid outbreaks and build consumer trust. Physical and chemical detection focuses on identifying heavy metals, antibiotic residues, and toxins. In Scandinavian fish farms, regular chemical testing is conducted to ensure clean feeding practices and water quality, helping maintain export credibility. By application, government agencies are major users of both detection types, conducting inspections at ports and local markets. In Kenya, government labs perform chemical testing on fish caught from Lake Victoria to ensure safety before distribution. In the commercial sector, large retailers and seafood processors have implemented in-house testing labs to meet buyer demands and comply with international safety norms. For example, a leading seafood brand in Brazil uses both detection methods to certify its frozen fish products before shipment. Together, these segments reflect a growing focus on protecting consumer health, meeting trade requirements, and promoting accountability throughout the global seafood supply chain.
Regional Analysis:
The seafood safety testing market has grown steadily across all five major regions, shaped by regional consumption patterns and regulatory demands. In North America, rising demand for premium and imported seafood has led to stricter enforcement of testing protocols. Major supermarkets in Canada now require full microbiological and chemical reports before accepting international shipments. In Europe, sustainability and food safety have driven innovation in testing technologies. Countries like Spain have adopted rapid detection systems in coastal towns where seafood is processed daily. In Asia Pacific, where seafood is a staple, governments have started funding mobile testing labs. In Indonesia, small ports have been equipped with detection kits to monitor fish quality before market entry. Latin America has focused on improving traceability and quality to maintain access to foreign markets. In Ecuador, shrimp farms have partnered with labs to test for antibiotic residues to meet international standards. The Middle East & Africa region has seen increased testing in growing aquaculture hubs. In Oman, new seafood processing zones have introduced strict testing checkpoints to protect exports. Each region, though unique in approach, shares a common goal—ensuring the safety of seafood through effective and timely testing, reflecting the global importance of consumer health and sustainable food systems.
Competitive Scenario:
The global seafood safety testing market has seen significant advancements, driven by the efforts of key industry players to ensure food quality and safety. Companies such as SGS SA have expanded their capabilities by opening advanced fisheries and food testing laboratories, exemplified by their facility in Surabaya, Indonesia, which enhances testing services for seafood contaminants. AsureQuality Limited has upgraded its Auckland laboratory to improve food testing accuracy and efficiency, reflecting a commitment to technological innovation in safety assessments. Eurofins Scientific SE has integrated automation and robotics into its testing processes, streamlining operations and increasing throughput. Intertek Group Plc has focused on rapid testing methods, developing portable devices that deliver quick and reliable results, crucial for on-site seafood inspections. Collaborations have also been pivotal; Romer Labs Inc. partnered with local entities to expand its presence in Southeast Asia, addressing regional safety concerns. Additionally, the adoption of AI and machine learning by companies like Bureau Veritas SA has enhanced data analysis, leading to more precise detection of contaminants. These developments underscore a collective industry effort to leverage technological advancements and strategic partnerships, ensuring the delivery of safe and high-quality seafood products to consumers worldwide.
Seafood Safety Testing Market Report Scope
Report Attribute | Details |
---|
Market Size Value in 2024 | USD 4.73 Billion |
Revenue Forecast in 2035 | USD 23.94 Billion |
Growth Rate | CAGR of 15.86% from 2025 to 2035 |
Historic Period | 2021 - 2024 |
Forecasted Period | 2025 - 2035 |
Report Coverage | Revenue forecast, company ranking, competitive landscape, growth factors, and trends |
Regions Covered | North America; Europe; Asia Pacific; Latin America; Middle East & Africa |
Countries Covered | U.S.; Canada; Mexico, UK; Germany; France; Spain; Italy; Russia; China; Japan; India; South Korea; Australia; Southeast Asia; Brazil; Argentina; Saudi Arabia; UAE; South Africa |
Key companies profiled | Swift Silliker (Pty) Ltd; Asurequality Limited; Genon Laboratories Ltd.; Bio-Rad Laboratories; Burea Veritas SA; SGS SA; Campden BRI; Det Norske Veritas As (DNV); Eurofins Central Analytical Laboratories Inc.; Food Hygiene & Health Laboratory; IFP Institut Fur Produktqualitat GMBH; ILS Limited; Intertek Group Plc; MVTL Laboratories Inc.; Romer Labs Inc.; DTS Laboratories |
Customization | Free report customization (equivalent up to 8 analysts working days) with purchase. Addition or alteration to country, regional & segment scope. |
The Global Seafood Safety Testing Market report is segmented as follows:
By Type,
- Microbiological detection
- Physical & Chemical detection
By Application,
By Region,
- North America
- Europe
- UK
- Germany
- France
- Spain
- Italy
- Russia
- Rest of Europe
- Asia Pacific
- China
- Japan
- India
- South Korea
- Australia
- Southeast Asia
- Rest of Asia Pacific
- Latin America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of Latin America
- Middle East & Africa
- Saudi Arabia
- UAE
- South Africa
- Rest of Middle East and Africa
Key Market Players,
- Swift Silliker (Pty) Ltd
- Asurequality Limited
- Genon Laboratories Ltd.
- Bio-Rad Laboratories
- Burea Veritas SA
- SGS SA
- Campden BRI
- Det Norske Veritas As (DNV)
- Eurofins Central Analytical Laboratories Inc.
- Food Hygiene & Health Laboratory
- IFP Institut Fur Produktqualitat GMBH
- ILS Limited
- Intertek Group Plc
- MVTL Laboratories Inc.
- Romer Labs Inc.
- DTS Laboratories
Frequently Asked Questions
Global Seafood Safety Testing Market Size was valued at USD 4.73 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach at USD 23.94 Billion in 2035.
Global Seafood Safety Testing Market is expected to grow at a CAGR of around 15.86% during the forecasted year.
North America, Asia Pacific and Europe are major regions in the global Seafood Safety Testing Market.
Key players analyzed in the global Seafood Safety Testing Market are Swift Silliker (Pty) Ltd; Asurequality Limited; Genon Laboratories Ltd.; Bio-Rad Laboratories; Burea Veritas SA; SGS SA; Campden BRI; Det Norske Veritas As (DNV); Eurofins Central Analytical Laboratories Inc.; Food Hygiene & Health Laboratory; IFP Institut Fur Produktqualitat GMBH; ILS Limited; Intertek Group Plc; MVTL Laboratories Inc.; Romer Labs Inc.; DTS Laboratories and so on.
Research Objectives
- Proliferation and maturation of trade in the global Seafood Safety Testing Market.
- The market share of the global Seafood Safety Testing Market, supply and demand ratio, growth revenue, supply chain analysis, and business overview.
- Current and future market trends that are influencing the growth opportunities and growth rate of the global Seafood Safety Testing Market.
- Feasibility study, new market insights, company profiles, investment return, market size of the global Seafood Safety Testing Market.
Chapter 1 Seafood Safety Testing Market Executive Summary
- 1.1 Seafood Safety Testing Market Research Scope
- 1.2 Seafood Safety Testing Market Estimates and Forecast (2021-2035)
- 1.2.1 Global Seafood Safety Testing Market Value and Growth Rate (2021-2035)
- 1.2.2 Global Seafood Safety Testing Market Price Trend (2021-2035)
- 1.3 Global Seafood Safety Testing Market Value Comparison, by Type (2021-2035)
- 1.3.1 Microbiological detection
- 1.3.2 Physical & Chemical detection
- 1.4 Global Seafood Safety Testing Market Value Comparison, by Application (2021-2035)
- 1.4.1 Government
- 1.4.2 Commercial
Chapter 2 Research Methodology
- 2.1 Introduction
- 2.2 Data Capture Sources
- 2.2.1 Primary Sources
- 2.2.2 Secondary Sources
- 2.3 Market Size Estimation
- 2.4 Market Forecast
- 2.5 Assumptions and Limitations
Chapter 3 Market Dynamics
- 3.1 Market Trends
- 3.2 Opportunities and Drivers
- 3.3 Challenges
- 3.4 Market Restraints
- 3.5 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
Chapter 4 Supply Chain Analysis and Marketing Channels
- 4.1 Seafood Safety Testing Supply Chain Analysis
- 4.2 Marketing Channels
- 4.3 Seafood Safety Testing Suppliers List
- 4.4 Seafood Safety Testing Distributors List
- 4.5 Seafood Safety Testing Customers
Chapter 5 COVID-19 & Russia?Ukraine War Impact Analysis
- 5.1 COVID-19 Impact Analysis on Seafood Safety Testing Market
- 5.2 Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis on Seafood Safety Testing Market
Chapter 6 Seafood Safety Testing Market Estimate and Forecast by Region
- 6.1 Global Seafood Safety Testing Market Value by Region: 2021 VS 2023 VS 2035
- 6.2 Global Seafood Safety Testing Market Scenario by Region (2021-2023)
- 6.2.1 Global Seafood Safety Testing Market Value Share by Region (2021-2023)
- 6.3 Global Seafood Safety Testing Market Forecast by Region (2024-2035)
- 6.3.1 Global Seafood Safety Testing Market Value Forecast by Region (2024-2035)
- 6.4 Geographic Market Analysis: Market Facts and Figures
- 6.4.1 North America Seafood Safety Testing Market Estimates and Projections (2021-2035)
- 6.4.2 Europe Seafood Safety Testing Market Estimates and Projections (2021-2035)
- 6.4.3 Asia Pacific Seafood Safety Testing Market Estimates and Projections (2021-2035)
- 6.4.4 Latin America Seafood Safety Testing Market Estimates and Projections (2021-2035)
- 6.4.5 Middle East & Africa Seafood Safety Testing Market Estimates and Projections (2021-2035)
Chapter 7 Global Seafood Safety Testing Competition Landscape by Players
- 7.1 Global Top Seafood Safety Testing Players by Value (2021-2023)
- 7.2 Seafood Safety Testing Headquarters and Sales Region by Company
- 7.3 Company Recent Developments, Mergers & Acquisitions, and Expansion Plans
Chapter 8 Global Seafood Safety Testing Market, by Type
- 8.1 Global Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Type (2021-2035)
- 8.1.1 Microbiological detection
- 8.1.2 Physical & Chemical detection
Chapter 9 Global Seafood Safety Testing Market, by Application
- 9.1 Global Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Application (2021-2035)
- 9.1.1 Government
- 9.1.2 Commercial
Chapter 10 North America Seafood Safety Testing Market
- 10.1 Overview
- 10.2 North America Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Country (2021-2035)
- 10.2.1 U.S.
- 10.2.2 Canada
- 10.2.3 Mexico
- 10.3 North America Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Type (2021-2035)
- 10.3.1 Microbiological detection
- 10.3.2 Physical & Chemical detection
- 10.4 North America Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Application (2021-2035)
- 10.4.1 Government
- 10.4.2 Commercial
Chapter 11 Europe Seafood Safety Testing Market
- 11.1 Overview
- 11.2 Europe Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Country (2021-2035)
- 11.2.1 UK
- 11.2.2 Germany
- 11.2.3 France
- 11.2.4 Spain
- 11.2.5 Italy
- 11.2.6 Russia
- 11.2.7 Rest of Europe
- 11.3 Europe Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Type (2021-2035)
- 11.3.1 Microbiological detection
- 11.3.2 Physical & Chemical detection
- 11.4 Europe Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Application (2021-2035)
- 11.4.1 Government
- 11.4.2 Commercial
Chapter 12 Asia Pacific Seafood Safety Testing Market
- 12.1 Overview
- 12.2 Asia Pacific Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Country (2021-2035)
- 12.2.1 China
- 12.2.2 Japan
- 12.2.3 India
- 12.2.4 South Korea
- 12.2.5 Australia
- 12.2.6 Southeast Asia
- 12.2.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
- 12.3 Asia Pacific Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Type (2021-2035)
- 12.3.1 Microbiological detection
- 12.3.2 Physical & Chemical detection
- 12.4 Asia Pacific Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Application (2021-2035)
- 12.4.1 Government
- 12.4.2 Commercial
Chapter 13 Latin America Seafood Safety Testing Market
- 13.1 Overview
- 13.2 Latin America Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Country (2021-2035)
- 13.2.1 Brazil
- 13.2.2 Argentina
- 13.2.3 Rest of Latin America
- 13.3 Latin America Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Type (2021-2035)
- 13.3.1 Microbiological detection
- 13.3.2 Physical & Chemical detection
- 13.4 Latin America Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Application (2021-2035)
- 13.4.1 Government
- 13.4.2 Commercial
Chapter 14 Middle East & Africa Seafood Safety Testing Market
- 14.1 Overview
- 14.2 Middle East & Africa Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Country (2021-2035)
- 14.2.1 Saudi Arabia
- 14.2.2 UAE
- 14.2.3 South Africa
- 14.2.4 Rest of Middle East & Africa
- 14.3 Middle East & Africa Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Type (2021-2035)
- 14.3.1 Microbiological detection
- 14.3.2 Physical & Chemical detection
- 14.4 Middle East & Africa Seafood Safety Testing Market Value, by Application (2021-2035)
- 14.4.1 Government
- 14.4.2 Commercial
Chapter 15 Company Profiles and Market Share Analysis: (Business Overview, Market Share Analysis, Products/Services Offered, Recent Developments)
- 15.1 Swift Silliker (Pty) Ltd
- 15.2 Asurequality Limited
- 15.3 Genon Laboratories Ltd.
- 15.4 Bio-Rad Laboratories
- 15.5 Burea Veritas SA
- 15.6 SGS SA
- 15.7 Campden BRI
- 15.8 Det Norske Veritas As (DNV)
- 15.9 Eurofins Central Analytical Laboratories Inc.
- 15.10 Food Hygiene & Health Laboratory
- 15.11 IFP Institut Fur Produktqualitat GMBH
- 15.12 ILS Limited
- 15.13 Intertek Group Plc
- 15.14 MVTL Laboratories Inc.
- 15.15 Romer Labs Inc.
- 15.16 DTS Laboratories